Presumably Caidin must have seen a copy of this document
from one of the American recipients. The following points
seem relevant:
I have tried to check the reference Caidin gives three times
now at the PRO, once by using a professional researcher. It
does not exist. However the AIR files were all re-numbered at
some point prior to them being located at the PRO and it is
possible the reference refers to the files' original designation.
It is also possible the reference pertains to the accompanying
letter when it was sent to the USA. This is unlikely however, as
the memo is stated to have been sent from one UK source to
another and then on to the USA. The Rubber stamp clearly
states it was received on 17 October, pre-dating Caidin's
reference by seven days. But the sheer number of channels
through which documents went could be the reason for this confusion,
and now the original document has been located I don't think
we need get hung up on the original reference any more.
I have found no record of most of the personnel listed. However a Squadron
Leader Heath was involved in the UK's investigations of the Scandinavian
'ghost rockets' in 1946.
Besides the above, other than some possibly excusable authorial hype,
Caidin has recorded the incident more or less as the document states.
Conclusion
At least we now know Caidin's reference exists! Besides that
there is little to say really. The objects reported are intriguing
but not completely mystifying. There were many types of flak
being used by the Germans in W.W.II and several files in the
PRO refer to coloured flak, flak which threw off unusual
fragments, and so on. This explanation is made more likely by
the fact that the 'F.L.O.' in Caidin's reference stands for 'Flak
Liaison Officer', at least suggesting that the Air Ministry were
treating it within a flak context.
The objects could also have been some kind of 'window'
dropped by the Germans in an attempt to disrupt radar or radio
communication among air crew. The explanation as to what the
small objects were is now more of a task for the air historian
than it is for the ufologist. What is clear from the original
account is that the discs, whilst unusual, were clearly not any
type of 'craft', under intelligent or purposeful control or
dangerous to the air craft or crew.
In my opinion these objects do not belong in the category of
sightings referred to as 'foo-fighters', both by their physical
description and by their behaviour and characteristics. Although
often lumped in with foo-fighter reports they are clearly
different. This story has been a staple of UFO writers for the
past three-four decades. Now we have further clarification and I
believe that this particular mystery is more or less laid to rest. - © 2000 Andy Roberts
References